October 06, 2006

I saw this story--

Man tries to drive 310 miles in reverse and was reminded of Kitchenhand's late adventure with a Hyundai Accent, in which reverse driving was not done, but the subject came up nonetheless.

Silly Australians--down there all upside down, driving on the wrong side of the road, and backwards!

Posted by Terry Oglesby at October 6, 2006 03:04 PM
Comments

In years gone by the driver would have been lauded for being resourceful, even daring, in the face of extreme danger; but no - they go and arrest him. It's only the middle of the desert. You might see a car in a month. He could have died of thirst. He probably didn't have a phone and have you tried to call a mobile mechanic lately? 'Yeah, I'll be there on Tuesday. Maybe Wednesday.'

The report I read quoted the guy saying that he was averaging around 40 k/mh but had reached up to 80 on occasion, however the car, an early Ford LTD, kept 'swerving wildly across the road.'

I wondered if a front wheel drive car would have been any easier to steer. Maybe I should have tested the Hyundai.


Posted by: kitchen hand at October 7, 2006 02:52 AM

Just to be as pedantic as Dr Weevil (and since Dr Weevil doesn't know much about cars):

Front wheel drive shouldn't make a difference. The steering has positive caster going forward, but is unstable because of negative caster going backward.

Explanation (including comparison to grocery shopping cart) at http://www.michelinman.com/care/tip3.html

Posted by: steevil (Dr Weevil's bro Steve) at October 7, 2006 11:54 AM

I guessed as much, steevil. I suppose if the steering were connected to the rear non-drive wheels, it would be more stable. I mean in theory, I know they can't actually turn.

Posted by: kitchen hand at October 8, 2006 01:31 AM

Say--I wonder how he would have done with something like GM's Quadrasteer or the old Honda 4 wheel steering system? INQUIRING MINDS WANT ANSWERS!!

Posted by: Terry Oglesby at October 9, 2006 08:29 AM