February 15, 2006

Most idiotic car ad ever?

Possibly--I just can't quite get a grip on what they could have been thinking.

My newest Automobile magazine came in the other day, and last night was the first time I've had a chance to thumb through it. As I paged along, I came to a nice slick Saab ad--a new 9-3 silhouetted in front of a Saab fighter jet. Cool. Dark and forbidding and techy, all in one. Up at the top, the Saab logo and the tagline "Born From Jets."

Well, Saab has over the years often made mention of their aeromotive history in close association with their cars--one of my favorite ads is a shot of a Saab car on the ground with a fighter blasting by, inverted, just overhead.

Anyway, the ad in the magazine was a fold-out, so I did--nifty--a color poster inside of a 9-3 on a runway. (I assume the ad was supposed to commemorate Automobile's 20 years in print since it had a "20" logo with the magazine's logo and the dates. I might have missed the ad in previous issues, but this was the first one I can recall seeing.) I folded it back over and saw the ad copy, which had a picture of a lumpy Saab J21 and a lovably homely 92 sitting beside it on a runway.

j21-3.jpg

The caption?

"Before Saab made cars, Saab made jets."

Well, it was kinda comical to me, because as you can see, the J21 in the photo has a very obvious propeller sticking up from between the tailbooms. So, there was that, and I also thought that they started making cars before they got into the jet business. Well, whatever.

Then I turned the fold out over to the back, and saw this corker, which is really what got me all worked up enough to post all this crap--"After World War II, there wasn't a demand for jets anymore. So Saab decided to compete in what the believed would be a postwar automotive boom."

WHAT!?

Now you don't have to be a car guy, or an airplane guy, or a World War II guy to recognize that first sentence doesn't make a lick of sense. After World War II, there wasn't a demand for jets!? Jets were the Next Big Thing! That's just stupid. Sure--every manufacturer was concerned about what to do after military orders dried up, but jets were where the technology was going. And further, it made it sound like everyone, including Saab, was making jets during World War II, which is stupid, too--the only operational jet fighters during the war were the German Me262 and He178, and the British Gloster Meteor, and (barely) the Lockheed P-80.

To the Googlemachine!

In five seconds, I found this website that details the timeline of the J21. Read it, and you will note that it did not enter service until 1946 and stuck around until 1952. Which is interesting, in that WWII ended in 1945. Also note that it was one of only two fighters successfully converted from prop to jet power. The resulting J21R entered service in 1947, which is the year that the first 92 prototype was made, and hung on until 1955, when the J32 took over. (Update--the J29 entered service in 1953)

Anyway, in the greater scheme of things, it really doesn't make that big of a deal, but to those folks who are sticklers for such things, it seems like such an easy thing to NOT try to manufacture an alternative corporate history just to suit an ad tagline. If anything, the 92 and the transition to jets at Saab happened together--it was born WITH jets--why not emphasize it as a big brother-little brother relationship?

I blame GM.

Posted by Terry Oglesby at February 15, 2006 09:09 AM
Comments

Wasn’t it hard to pilot a jet while wearing Birkenstocks and drinking a latte?

Posted by: jim at February 15, 2006 09:47 AM

These were the old-timey Swedes who flew while wearing a herring loaf and drinking aquavit.

Posted by: Terry Oglesby at February 15, 2006 09:58 AM

They've been running the "before they made cars, they made jets" ads on the radio here in the Baltimore-Washington area.

I looked up what jets Saab currently makes:
the Gripen (Griffon) which replaced the:
Viggen (Thunderbolt, or maybe a kind of duck)
which replaced the:
Draken (Dragon)

The Gripen looks a bit like an F-16

Posted by: steevil at February 15, 2006 10:07 AM

This just proves what I have suspected all along: you have waaay too much time on your hands.

(It looks like Steevil might too.)

Posted by: Grouchy Old Yorkie Lady at February 15, 2006 10:16 AM

Ok this beats out the stupid ad I posted about that suggested that you risk having your car stripped down at border patrol

Posted by: Sarah G. at February 15, 2006 10:38 AM

OOooooh--Volkswagen's new "Your Fast" ads are even worse than that. Just absolutely stupid.

And GOYL, not too much time, just too much trivia inside my head.

Posted by: Terry Oglesby at February 15, 2006 10:41 AM

And in my case, brain tumor induced ADD (it's a benign tumor).

Posted by: steevil at February 15, 2006 10:54 AM

Don't blame GM. The problem is most likely that if they actually have a Corporate Archivist, none of the wet behind the ears snotnose copywriter types bothered to ask him about the copy in the ad. Clearly they also didn't take the five minutes you took to look online.

Blame GM if you like for hiring some dopey ad agency for a gajillion dollars that couldn't be bothered to fact check.

Posted by: skinnydan at February 15, 2006 11:36 AM

GM does have a huge archive of stuff, although I'm not sure how well Saab is integrated into that. Still, I think it's less about looking and more along the lines of your second statement--they probably just figure no one cares.

Posted by: Terry Oglesby at February 15, 2006 11:47 AM

I'll second that nomination for the Volkswagen ads. Just stupid - and where's the appeal to buy one of those stupid cars? You get a demon riding along with you? They must be reaching for the big non-Christian/Jewish market slice.

Any idea what would happen if you told your "significant other" (i.e. wife) to stop the "yakkin" because you could not hear your engine? I'm guessing the next time you went driving she would play a tape or CD of engine noise and then drive in another car (after whoppin' you upside the head).

[And about the Saab's ... don't forget about the feared Svedish Air Force.]

Posted by: MarcV at February 15, 2006 12:12 PM

The bad thing is that the new GTi is finally worth driving again.

As for what would happen were I too act in such a way, all I can say is that My Fast would be the least of my worries.

Posted by: Terry Oglesby at February 15, 2006 12:31 PM

They should have went with a quasi-symbiotic theme:

Land. Air. (We're working on conquering the sea.)

Curing rage at all altitudes for decades.

What the neighbors oogle, from cockpits to cabins.

Posted by: Kenny at February 15, 2006 03:06 PM

I really like that first one--all of them are better than what they managed to come up with.

Posted by: Terry Oglesby at February 16, 2006 08:26 AM