January 03, 2006

Movies!

During my time off, I actually got to go to the moving picture show, not once, but TWICE! Good grief, no wonder movies seem to make so much money nowadays--you could feed a family of six for two days on the price of admission, which, of course, doesn't count the equal amount spent on flavored sugar water and a bucket of corn-flavored air. [/grump]

First up was a group effort to go see Cheaper by the Dozen 2, which included all of us, plus meeting Beau #4 at the theater.

The first version was pretty good, although still saddled with a bit too much contrived cuteness. This one, however, kicks it up a notch with even more contrivedness, and little of it directed at the cuteness factor. Somehow Steve Martin is no longer coaching, or he is, but whatever he's doing, it's in Chicago. Piper Perabo is unconvincingly way past pregnant, complete with annoying fake distended belly that keeps poking out from underneath her flouncy non-maternity tops. And she never sweats. Although she holds her back a lot. And when her water breaks, her shorts remain nice and dry.

Anyway, the family goes on vacation for old time's sake to the lake and decide to try to win some sort of stupid trophy from Carmen Electra (who has large breasts) and Earl Camembert (or Stan Schmenge), who doesn't. There is a subplot of one of the girl kids becoming a girly-girl, and the complete waste of film Hilary Duff, who plays a self-centered egotistical teenaged twit. Look, I go to the movie for escapism--not seeing a portrayal of self-centered egotistical teenaged twititude. Get enough of that as it is at home.

The scenes that were contrived to make me tear up and be all weepy worked, although not in a good way. Stuff like that shouldn't make you mad at yourself. It's not a bad movie, but it sure ain't no good, either. I give it two out of five curly possum tails, and I'm being generous.

You want something good? Read the book--the REAL book. (Admittedly, Lil wasn't quite as easy on the eyes as Bonnie Hunt, but then again, Bonnie Hunt hasn't got twelve kids.)

Other movie was one I took Rebecca, Jonathan, and Catherine to, as well as my big sister (detaining her from going home for another day)--The Chronicles of Narnia--The Lion, The Witch, the Wardrobe, and the Goat Man With A Disturbing Lack of Selfconsciousness Regarding his Goatiness, and His Unclothed Nipples.

I have a soft-spot for costume dramas, especially for those involving Jollye Olde, and what's not to like about C.S. Lewis? Overall, I have to say it was a very nice movie, although technical matters tend to keep it from being up in the great movie category. In this day and time, it's possible to do CGI so seamlessly that it's hard to distinguish unless you're just being a pedant, so you really notice it when the lushness of some effects is put into juxtaposition with some really lame-looking green screen stuff that wouldn't have passed muster even in the old Jason and the Argonauts fillum. Ebert's review is pretty much what I would say if I were a puffy movie critic, although I would like right now to call a halt to the use of the term "gob-smacked." It's everywhere nowadays, and really it works only if you tend to use other terms such as "po-faced git" in your usual conversation.

Anyway, the movie is very much okay, and not too scary for anyone younger than about eight or so. Very young kids might be put off by the violence of the battle scenes and the scary White Witch person who has sort of a Midas-like effect on people, in that when she touches them, they turn into mufflers. My kids liked it, and I did, too. With a couple of stupid provisos that deal with matters tactical. Because I can't enjoy anything without nitpicking.

But doggone it, don't insist of fighting a massed infantry on an open field when YOU have the high ground! Make the other side come to you! And if you have griffins who can carry boulders and fly along and bomb the enemy front lines, fly PARALLEL to the lines, NOT perpendicular. And second, unless they have machine guns, DON'T let them fly low enough to get hit by arrows! Stupid flying lion-eagles were just asking for it. And if you've got firebirds that come out of burning arrows, use a LOT of them, not just ONE.

Another thing--the goatman thing is just a little off-putting in more ways than one. Especially given a he-goat's well-known proclivity to vigorously goatify anything that moves, and even some things that don't. And when your goatman's only clothing is a silly SCARF, and he's a MUSICIAN, and he lures children into his lair with a promise of hot tea and scones, well, I mean, come ON! At least get him a nice blazer or something. And some pants, for goodness sake. Either that, or just be sure to have Thomas Mesereau standing by. And we're not even going to get into the minotaur/centaur deal. (Although I will say a couple of the girl centaurs were kinda hot.)

AND another thing--exactly what do people eat in Narnia? I mean, everything has a proper British accent, even the shrubbery. Sure, you can get away with vegetarianism around here, but when your carrots start screaming as they're peeled and boiled, I imagine you'd probably be a bit put off by it. Not me, obviously, but some might be.

Overall, though, despite my stupid nitpicking, I'd have to give it 4 out of 5 curly possum tails.

And those are your movie reviews for now!

Posted by Terry Oglesby at January 3, 2006 02:21 PM
Comments

...what do people eat in Narnia?

Scones and possum delight. And Faunatee (mmm, save a drumstick for me!).

Posted by: MarcV at January 3, 2006 02:38 PM

I re-read the Narnia books last week. Lewis is quite funny over diet things. In one book, he sys that in Narnia, they ate real meat, none of that soya that some in England do.

It seems that when Narnia was created, only some animals got the gift of gab (i.e., some deer can talk, the rest are venison). The same goes for the other animals, some are "people", the rest are game as it were.

Lewis' fauns are all good guys just as his Minotaurs are all bad. Sort of like the Alabama-Auburn divide.

Posted by: Larry Anderson at January 3, 2006 02:44 PM

I would also point out in Ma Lillian's defense that Ms. Hunt has access to certain elective surgeries that can dramatically slow the rages of nature.

I suspect without them she'd look something like this.

Posted by: skinnydan at January 3, 2006 02:47 PM

Mmmmm--cornbread battered and deep fried satyr on a stick!

As for talkative versus non-talkative game, I think were I one of the gabby ones, I'd be wearing a bright orange vest all the time. Then again, some hungry soul would probably take advantage of that, and have to bury the vest.

And Skinnydan, we shall have no more photos of the White Witch.

Posted by: Terry Oglesby at January 3, 2006 03:25 PM

I gor one, thought Thom the goat taking a little girl back to his cave and drugging her with tea was waay too creepy. The Ice Queen buying the boy's confidence with sweets was equally disturbing in a post-internet, chat room kind of way.

I did enjoy the rest of the movie. And one of my personal points about animals was proven, that is, that animals have a real name, we humans just don't speak the language to learn it, so we name them whatever we like. How much better would our relationships be with our pets if we could call them by their proper names?

Posted by: Nate at January 3, 2006 03:52 PM

I don't think it was the tea--I think it was those groovy world-beat/Jethro Tull-inspired tunes on his little set of pipes that got her nodding off.

It is a shame that our societal discourse is such that grotesque alternative readings fall so readily to hand.

As for speaking animal, our relationship with pets might be better as long as kitties and puppies remain carnivores, and don't get all uppity and insist we all start eating only Brother Radish.

Posted by: Terry Oglesby at January 3, 2006 04:17 PM

I haven't seen the Narnia movie yet, but all the kids have. I LOVED the books. I tried to get Tim to read them a couple of months ago, but he wasn't interested at all. After he saw the movie, he started reading the book AND printing Narnia bookmarks.

Posted by: Kathy at January 3, 2006 05:00 PM

To date, mine seem to have been satisfied with the junk that comes with McDonald's Happy Meals.

Figures.

Posted by: Terry Oglesby at January 3, 2006 05:08 PM

I've been debating over going to see the Narnia movie. Did they keep it fairly close to Lewis' original story or did the dilute it to Hollywood standards?

Posted by: Leah at January 3, 2006 06:48 PM

Well, it's sorta like the Harry Potters and Lord of the Rings type things--it's more or less true to the spirit of things, but details and timing of events just can't be the same due to the differences in the media. Larry would probably be a better judge, since it's been a very long time since I've read any of the books.

Posted by: Terry Oglesby at January 3, 2006 09:37 PM